2008年7月11日

FriendFeed的周五提示#6:如何判断原创

By popular demand, I've been asked by other FriendFeed users to highlight how I use the popular social lifestreaming site. So far the series has coveredthe "Hide" function,the bookmarklet,advanced search,如何与谷歌谈整合, and how you can从带来的Fr188金宝博亚洲iendFeed的评论你的博客. Today, a new wrinkle: determining an item's original source.

在它的基础上,的FriendFeedis an aggregator of Web activity, from you, and from your friends or peers. Activity on the Web that you aggregate can be of two types: data that you create yourself (blog posts, Tweets, Flickr photos, etc.) and data that you like which others have created (Google Reader shares, YouTube favorites, etc.). Typically, it's fairly easy to distinguish between those pieces you're sharing and those pieces you're creating, but in the last few weeks, there have been some notable errors made, so with more people flocking to the popular service, it's time we had some clarification.

Your FriendFeed stream typically consists of service icons, an active verb, and the service itself. The verbs themselves give away whether you were the author or simply, a fan.

Services Where I am the Content Creator 服务我在哪里内容的范 这似乎很简单。在第一组中,我张贴,评论,发布和更新。在第二组中,我添加书签,分享,喜欢,爱好和收藏。但在过去的几周里,已经出现了中基团糊涂了一些显着的事件。

1. Mark Hopkins Reports Sarah Perez Leaving ReadWriteWeb

在周三晚上,Mashable的马克霍普金斯报道,在他的个人博客,说的通俗,多产,萨拉·佩雷斯would be leaving blogging monolith读写网forSitePoint. (看到这里FriendFeed的讨论)


但它是不正确的。事实上,莎拉的前同事乔希Catone的是一个宣布转会SitePoint。怎么马克感到困惑?原来,莎拉曾订阅Josh的谷歌阅读器博客和共享的项目(see that share here on FriendFeed)。

点击进入共享项目可以说是混乱。该帖子称这是一次宣布在这里笔者将读写网后博客和稀疏的tumblr界面并没有对任何人它的名字。马克,以为他是在一个瓢,就跑了。当然,他能看到先前的帖子在读写网,杰克与他的告别,但d吗idn't happen.


How could this have been avoided? First, it's unlikely Sarah would be sharing an item from her personal blog that wasn't registered with FriendFeed. The item clearly said "shared" not "posted", as outlined above. While many people, including me, will share items from their own blog to Google Reader, for it to show up first as shared before the actual blog item came through is unlikely.

2.谢尔以色列积分我的两个帖子我没有做

Shel Israel has weathered enough nonsense from the blogosphere over the last year, so this isn't any personal slight at all to bring this up. He's been very nice to me, saying in June that I was "consistently thoughtful, original and accurate". But of late, he's given me too much credit, where it's not due.

7月5日,他写了一篇关于谷歌的/维亚康姆的决定后,从很大程度上吸引了a post on Profy from Cyndy Aleo-Carreira. Throughout the first version of the post, he said "Louis went and read the decision several times...", and "thanks to Louis Gray, who took the time to do some digging." While the post此后一直更新,它给了我所有的功劳。


他的鸣叫7月5日仍达, as does他的修正案.




But the very next day, it happened again.


谢尔发送鸣叫, saying: "Louis Gray (this time I'm sure it's him) says there are about 75K Friendfeed usershttp://tinyurl.com/GN000006“。

But it wasn't me. Again, I had shared a link in Google Reader to a third-party blog, this time, fromUser21,通过尤瓦Atzmon写.

由于许多博客作者已经担心RSS刮削或打破职位没有得到归属,或失去评论一个服务或另一个,它是非常重要的肯定,我们给予信贷到其应有的。188金宝博亚洲我不打算停止共享RSS项目,我的谷歌阅读器的链接博客,我不认为莎拉·佩雷斯或者我们很多谁使用这些会服务。我不会停止在YouTube上加入最爱的项目,Last.fm上的爱心歌曲,书签博客文章或挖掘项目。但我希望的差异是显而易见的。尽可能多的乐趣,因为它是被认可的,我不想采取信贷别人的工作,我敢肯定,萨拉并不想采取感兴趣的博客寻找雇佣她的电话。所以,如果你看的FriendFeed,以确定谁是原始来源,看看活跃动词,然后,如果仍然不能确定,通过点击该项目并查看其来源。它不应该是太混乱。